Monday, March 3, 2014

Remuneration: Pay effects at Work


There is debate in literature over the issue of how pay affects the performance of firm’s human resource. Some say pay affects motivation and hence has positive influence. Others have a different view. Pay level, pay form and pay structure define how remuneration is provided. Pay level refers to organisation’s pay position with respect to industry benchmark or other competitors. It can be leading, lagging or level. Pay form defines how pay is given and what part is fixed and what is incentive or performance based. Pay structure refers to whether it is hierarchical or flat.

Several theories like agency theory, reinforcement theory, goal-setting theory, expectancy theory etc. support the fact that incentive structure affects the employee performance positively. While Cognitive evaluation theory says that it can be harmful due to effect on intrinsic task motivation. Incentive or reward system is extrinsic motivation. But most literatures agree that there is no negative effect of reward on motivation. How much positive effect it has may vary. Gain sharing plans, or group incentives, ESOPs etc, have been found to enhance employee motivation, leaning and involvement and hence their performance. There is also “sorting” effect on performance. Sorting into different pay conditions is required to study the effect. Sometimes group incentive system may suffer from the “free rider effect” and “1/n effect” and performance may not increase as much as expected with incentive. But this again can be mitigated by monitoring and peer pressure so that performance of group does not go down because of some non-performers and hence those who are capable and high performing exert pressure on low performers to catch up so that they do not loose on incentives.

Effects of Pay structure

“Inequality, rather than want, is the cause of trouble.”

  • Pay structure has two aspects
  •  Pay dispersion
  •  Pay basis

Pay dispersion has again been studied in different contexts by many and has been said to have positive as well as negative effect on performance. This is sometimes related to tournament theory where players perform for the trophy. This is usual practice for the pay of top executives .The pay is usually greater than their marginal contribution. Pay dispersion among the same level can be due to experience, qualification etc.

Pay basis is defined in terms of whether the pay is job based or person based. Job based pay is usually related to job and evaluation of job. It is graded and hierarchical. Both internal and external evaluation of job and activities is done to price the job. While person based pay is on the performance and work of individual.


Pay level effect is generally not significant. It is widely accepted practice to reach at a market stabilised rate of payment or wages but it is not necessarily true that higher than market rate of wage may translate into higher performance due to employee retention.


                                                          ***

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
गुड्डू रंगीला 

Knowledge Partner,
Charcha Kendra

No comments:

Post a Comment